Can you rely mostly on synthetic monitoring?

"Can we just monitor everything from the outside?" It's a fair question, especially when you're dealing with systems you can't modify, tight security constraints, or organizational boundaries that make instrumentation challenging. Sometimes synthetic monitoring isn't just a choice, it's your only practical option.

Why you might lean heavily on synthetic monitoring

Let's be honest about the real-world constraints that push teams toward synthetic-first monitoring:

Limited system access

You can't modify the codebase:

Legacy systems without deployment pipelines
Third-party applications you don't control
Strict change control processes that make instrumentation difficult
Microservices owned by other teams

You can't access infrastructure:

Shared hosting environments (like GitHub Pages)
Managed services with limited monitoring capabilities
Security policies that prevent agent installation
Container environments where you can't modify base images

Organizational constraints

Team boundaries and responsibilities:

DevOps teams that need to monitor without involving developers
Separation of concerns between infrastructure and application teams
Compliance requirements that limit code access
Different teams with different monitoring tool preferences

Resource limitations:

Small teams that can't maintain complex monitoring stacks
Budget constraints that limit monitoring tool options
Skills gaps where synthetic monitoring is easier to implement
Time constraints that favor external monitoring solutions

What synthetic monitoring can actually tell you

The good news: synthetic monitoring can cover more than you might think, especially for user-facing systems.

User experience monitoring

Site availability and performance:

// Playwright script for comprehensive site monitoring
const { test } = require('@playwright/test');

test('Blog platform health check', async ({ page }) => {
  const startTime = Date.now();
  
  // Basic availability
  await page.goto('https://yourblog.com');
  
  // Page load performance
  const loadTime = Date.now() - startTime;
  console.log(`Page load time: ${loadTime}ms`);
  
  // Essential functionality
  await page.click('text=Latest Posts');
  await page.waitForSelector('[data-testid="post-list"]');
  
  // On-chain data integration
  await page.click('text=Blockchain Analysis');
  await page.waitForSelector('[data-testid="arweave-data"]', { timeout: 10000 });
});

Metrics you can track:

Uptime percentage across different regions
Page load times for key user journeys
Core web vitals (LCP, FID, CLS)
Geographic performance variations

End-to-end functionality testing

Critical user flows:

test('Complete user journey', async ({ page }) => {
  // User discovers content
  await page.goto('https://yourblog.com');
  await page.fill('[data-testid="search"]', 'monitoring');
  await page.click('[data-testid="search-button"]');
  
  // User reads content
  await page.click('text=Monitoring Best Practices');
  const contentLoaded = await page.isVisible('[data-testid="article-content"]');
  
  // User engages with on-chain features
  await page.click('[data-testid="view-on-arweave"]');
  const arweaveDataVisible = await page.isVisible('[data-testid="arweave-content"]');
  
  // Track success metrics
  console.log(`Content loaded: ${contentLoaded}`);
  console.log(`Arweave integration working: ${arweaveDataVisible}`);
});

What this tells you:

Whether your critical features actually work for users
If third-party integrations (like Arweave) are functioning
How changes affect the user experience
Geographic availability of your services

Deployment impact detection

Inferring deployment health:

// Monitor for deployment changes and their impact
test('Deployment impact assessment', async ({ page }) => {
  await page.goto('https://yourblog.com');
  
  // Check for version indicators
  const version = await page.getAttribute('[data-version]', 'data-version');
  const buildTime = await page.getAttribute('[data-build-time]', 'data-build-time');
  
  // Performance after deployment
  const performanceMetrics = await page.evaluate(() => {
    const navigation = performance.getEntriesByType('navigation')[0];
    return {
      loadTime: navigation.loadEventEnd - navigation.fetchStart,
      domContentLoaded: navigation.domContentLoadedEventEnd - navigation.fetchStart,
      firstPaint: performance.getEntriesByType('paint').find(p => p.name === 'first-paint')?.startTime
    };
  });
  
  console.log(`Version: ${version}, Performance:`, performanceMetrics);
});

Deployment metrics you can track:

Time between detected deployments
Performance impact of new releases
Error rates post-deployment
Feature availability after updates

The limitations you need to understand

Synthetic monitoring is powerful, but it has clear boundaries. Understanding these helps you set realistic expectations:

You can't see inside the system

Missing internal metrics:

Server resource usage (CPU, memory, disk)
Database performance and query optimization
Application-level error rates and stack traces
Internal service communication and dependencies

Real example: Your synthetic test shows page load times increasing, but you can't tell if it's due to:

Database query slowdowns
Memory leaks in your application
Network issues between services
Third-party API latency

Development team performance stays invisible

What you can't measure with synthetic monitoring:

Pull request cycle times and code review effectiveness
Commit frequency and development velocity
Test coverage and code quality trends
Bug fix times and technical debt accumulation

The gap: Your site might be working perfectly from a user perspective while your development process is struggling with technical debt and slow delivery.

Business intelligence remains limited

Missing context:

User behavior patterns and engagement depth
Conversion funnel performance and optimization opportunities
Feature usage analytics and adoption rates
Revenue correlation with technical performance

Maximizing synthetic monitoring value

When synthetic monitoring is your primary option, here's how to get the most from it:

Focus on user-centric outcomes

Align teams around user experience:

// Create tests that mirror real user behavior
const userJourneys = [
  {
    name: 'New visitor discovery',
    steps: ['land-on-homepage', 'browse-categories', 'read-article']
  },
  {
    name: 'Returning reader engagement',
    steps: ['direct-to-article', 'view-related-posts', 'share-content']
  },
  {
    name: 'Research deep-dive',
    steps: ['search-specific-topic', 'read-multiple-articles', 'access-on-chain-data']
  }
];

userJourneys.forEach(journey => {
  test(`User journey: ${journey.name}`, async ({ page }) => {
    // Implement each journey step
    // Track success rates and performance
  });
});

Benefits for team collaboration:

Both DevOps and development teams care about user experience
Clear success metrics that everyone understands
Shared responsibility for user-facing performance
Easier to justify monitoring improvements

Use synthetic tests to infer system health

Smart monitoring patterns:

// Detect system issues through user experience changes
test('System health inference', async ({ page }) => {
  const healthChecks = [];
  
  // Database health (inferred from content loading)
  const dbHealthStart = Date.now();
  await page.goto('https://yourblog.com/recent-posts');
  await page.waitForSelector('[data-testid="post-list"]');
  healthChecks.push({
    component: 'database',
    responseTime: Date.now() - dbHealthStart,
    status: 'healthy'
  });
  
  // On-chain integration health
  const arweaveHealthStart = Date.now();
  try {
    await page.click('[data-testid="view-on-arweave"]');
    await page.waitForSelector('[data-testid="arweave-content"]', { timeout: 5000 });
    healthChecks.push({
      component: 'arweave',
      responseTime: Date.now() - arweaveHealthStart,
      status: 'healthy'
    });
  } catch (error) {
    healthChecks.push({
      component: 'arweave',
      status: 'unhealthy',
      error: error.message
    });
  }
  
  console.log('System health:', healthChecks);
});

Bridge the instrumentation gap creatively

Use external data sources:

// Combine synthetic monitoring with external APIs
const { Octokit } = require('@octokit/rest');
const octokit = new Octokit({ auth: process.env.GITHUB_TOKEN });

// Track development metrics without code instrumentation
async function trackDevelopmentMetrics() {
  const { data: commits } = await octokit.rest.repos.listCommits({
    owner: 'yourorg',
    repo: 'yourblog',
    since: new Date(Date.now() - 7 * 24 * 60 * 60 * 1000).toISOString()
  });
  
  const { data: pullRequests } = await octokit.rest.pulls.list({
    owner: 'yourorg',
    repo: 'yourblog',
    state: 'closed',
    per_page: 20
  });
  
  const metrics = {
    commitsThisWeek: commits.length,
    averagePRTime: calculateAveragePRTime(pullRequests),
    deploymentFrequency: inferDeploymentFrequency(commits)
  };
  
  console.log('Development metrics:', metrics);
}

External tools for missing capabilities:

GitHub Insights: Built-in analytics for development velocity
Google Lighthouse: Performance scoring and optimization suggestions
Third-party monitoring: Tools like Pingdom or StatusCake for uptime
Web performance APIs: Browser performance metrics collection

Making synthetic-first monitoring work

Set up comprehensive test coverage

Create a test matrix that covers all critical functionality:

// Comprehensive synthetic monitoring matrix
const testMatrix = {
  'Core functionality': [
    'homepage-loads',
    'article-reading',
    'search-works',
    'navigation-functions'
  ],
  'Integrations': [
    'arweave-data-loads',
    'base-transactions-work',
    'external-apis-respond'
  ],
  'Performance': [
    'load-times-acceptable',
    'images-optimize-properly',
    'cdn-delivers-quickly'
  ],
  'Availability': [
    'site-reachable-globally',
    'ssl-certificates-valid',
    'dns-resolves-correctly'
  ]
};

Establish clear alerting and escalation

Smart alerting for synthetic monitoring:

// Alert configuration that avoids noise
const alertRules = {
  critical: {
    condition: 'site completely unavailable for 2+ minutes',
    action: 'page oncall immediately'
  },
  warning: {
    condition: 'performance degraded >50% for 5+ minutes',
    action: 'slack notification to team'
  },
  info: {
    condition: 'single test failure or minor performance issue',
    action: 'log for review during business hours'
  }
};

Foster collaboration despite constraints

Include development teams in synthetic test creation:

Have developers write tests for new features
Review synthetic test results during team meetings
Use test failures as debugging starting points
Share user journey insights with product teams

When synthetic monitoring is enough (and when it isn't)

Synthetic monitoring works well when

User experience is your primary concern
You have clear, testable user journeys
System changes are infrequent and well-controlled
Teams are aligned around user-facing metrics

You need more when

System complexity requires internal visibility
Performance optimization needs detailed metrics
Development velocity is a key business concern
Compliance requires comprehensive monitoring

The hybrid approach

Even when starting with synthetic monitoring, plan for evolution:

// Design synthetic tests that could integrate with future instrumentation
test('Future-ready monitoring', async ({ page }) => {
  // Test user experience (synthetic)
  await page.goto('https://yourblog.com');
  
  // Collect performance data that could correlate with internal metrics
  const performanceData = await page.evaluate(() => ({
    timing: performance.timing,
    resources: performance.getEntriesByType('resource').map(r => ({
      name: r.name,
      duration: r.duration,
      size: r.transferSize
    }))
  }));
  
  // Structure data for potential future correlation
  console.log('Performance context:', {
    timestamp: new Date().toISOString(),
    userAgent: await page.evaluate(() => navigator.userAgent),
    connection: await page.evaluate(() => navigator.connection?.effectiveType),
    performance: performanceData
  });
});

Remember: synthetic monitoring isn't a compromise, it's a valid monitoring strategy that focuses on what users actually experience. When implemented thoughtfully, it can provide valuable insights while respecting organizational and technical constraints. Start with user experience, be creative about filling gaps, and evolve your approach as your constraints change.

Next: Implementation guide for monitoring systems

Properties

Location

Stats