When should we use useReducer instead of useState?

Imagine we have a component with multiple states. It is simple enough not to use state management libraries. useState is surely a choice for the sake of brevity and clarity. But are there any issues we have to deal with? In this article, I want to make some improvements on useState hook and how we can replace it with useReducer as an alternative solution.

The problem

Let’s take a look at the code below:

function EditCalendarEvent() {
  const [startDate, setStartDate] = useState()
  const [endDate, setEndDate] = useState()
  const [title, setTitle] = useState('')
  const [description, setDescription] = useState('')
  const [location, setLocation] = useState()
  const [attendees, setAttendees] = useState([])

  return (
    <>
      <input value={title} onChange={(e) => setTitle(e.target.value)} />
      {/* ... */}
    </>
  )
}

The component is used to update a calendar event. Sadly, it has several problems:

• Using too many useState hooks make your code look like a mess, especially when the list of state grows longer and longer.
• No safeguards. In other words, you may not guarantee that state is updated accurately. There’s nothing preventing you from choosing an end date that’s before the start date. You can validate other related states first but only if you remember (or even know) they exist.

An improvement of useState

To improve the code above, we can gather all states in one big object:

function EditCalendarEvent() {
  const [event, setEvent] = useState({
    title: '',
    description: '',
    attendees: [],
  })

  return (
    <>
      <input value={event.title} onChange={(e) => setEvent({ ...event, title: e.target.value })} />
      {/* ... */}
    </>
  )
}

Look better. However, there are still potential pitfalls:

• Always remember to spread on ...event so you don’t mess up by mutating the object directly and subsequently causing React to not rerender as expected.

• You can validate before updating states but the validations are separated and somehow hard to control all of them.

One solution is using a curried function:

function EditCalendarEvent() {
  const [event, setEvent] = useState({
    title: '',
    description: '',
    attendees: [],
  })

  const handleChange = (field) => (e) => {
    // Validate and transform event to ensure state is always valid
    // in a centralized way
    // ...
    setEvent({ ...event, [field]: e.target.value })
  }

  return (
    <>
      <input value={event.title} onChange={handleChange('title')} />
      {/* ... */}
    </>
  )
}

Do not forget that there are two ways to update state now and make sure you pick the right one or else the curried function will be meaningless.

Adopting useReducer as an alternative to useState

Many people know useReducer, but a small number of them actually want to use it. With useReducer, we could rewrite the code to be like this:

function EditCalendarEvent() {
  const [event, updateEvent] = useReducer(
    (prev, next) => {
      return { ...prev, ...next }
    },
    { title: '', description: '', attendees: [] },
  )

  return (
    <>
      <input value={event.title} onChange={(e) => updateEvent({ title: e.target.value })} />
      {/* ... */}
    </>
  )
}

The useReducer hook helps you control transformations from state A to state B. This guarantees your states are always valid, in a fully centralized way. So with this model, even if the code becomes more complex, new states are added, we can still manage and maintain them without so much effort.

function EditCalendarEvent() {
  const [event, updateEvent] = useReducer(
    (prev, next) => {
      const newEvent = { ...prev, ...next }

      // Ensure that the start date is never after the end date
      if (newEvent.startDate > newEvent.endDate) {
        newEvent.endDate = newEvent.startDate
      }

      // Ensure that the title is never more than 100 chars
      if (newEvent.title.length > 100) {
        newEvent.title = newEvent.title.substring(0, 100)
      }
      return newEvent
    },
    { title: '', description: '', attendees: [] },
  )

  return (
    <>
      <input value={event.title} onChange={(e) => updateEvent({ title: e.target.value })} />
      {/* ... */}
    </>
  )
}

Other use cases for useReducer

As can be seen from code above, useReducer might replace useState for “complex state”, and moreover we do not need to follow the redux style. I still believe useReducer is underestimated.

Here is an example of toggling state with useReducer:

function EditCalendarEvent() {
  const [value, toggleValue] = useReducer((prev) => !prev, false)

  return (
    <>
      <button onClick={toggleValue}>Toggle</button>
    </>
  )
}

The implementation is simple, and it really shows the flexibility of useReducer.

If you love Redux, sure, you can adhere the action-based pattern as well. It is important to keep in mind that you must always treat the state value of the useReducer hook as immutable. To avoid running into this problem, Immer is one of the best choice.

The conclusion

In general, developers prefer useState to useReducer. It is not their fault since useState is more familiar and introduced from the very first tutorial of hooks. However, the ability to supply a function that controls state transitions of useReducer is great and surely worth your consideration.

Reference

• https://dev.to/builderio/a-cure-for-react-usestate-hell-1ldi